About

I am a Postdoctoral Associate at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, working with Prof. Evelina Fedorenko and Prof. Mark Richardson. My research investigates the neural mechanisms underlying language processing using intracranial recordings and computational modeling techniques.

I completed my Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University, where I conducted research with Prof. Gregory B. Cogan and Prof. Jonathan Viventi. My dissertation focused on uncovering the cortical mechanisms of human speech for both brain-computer interface (BCI) applications and speech neuroscience. Before that, I completed my masters in Biomedical Engineering at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.


I am passionate about bridging the gap between basic neuroscience and clinical applications using engineering techniques, with the ultimate goal of advancing our understanding of human cognition.Throughout this journey, I’ve collaborated closely with neuroscientists, clinicians, and neural engineers—and am deeply grateful to the patient participants whose altruism advances science


News & Talks

• August 2026: Presented a talk and a poster at Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN) 2026.
• February 2026: Awarded the Patrick J. McGovern Travel & Technology Award, MIT.
• August 2026: New paper: “Distinct neural processes link speech planning and execution”, published in Nature Human Behavior.
• August 2026: New paper: “Shared latent representations of speech production for cross-patient speech decoding”, published in Nature Communications (with Zachary Spalding et al.).
• May 2026: New preprint: “Monosynaptic connections link functionally similar regions in human cortex” (bioRxiv, 2026-05), currently under review at Nature.
• October 2024: Invited lab meeting speaker at the Brain Modulation Lab, MGH, Cambridge, MA.
• September 2024: Started as a Postdoctoral Associate at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, working with Evelina Fedorenko and Mark Richardson.
• July 2024: Defended my Ph.D. dissertation, “Quantifying spatio-temporal features of neural activity for human speech production,” at Duke University (advisors: Gregory Cogan & Jonathan Viventi).
• June 2024: Awarded the MIBR research fellowship, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT.
• March 2024: Invited lab meeting speaker, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA.
• February 2024: Invited lab meeting speaker, Prof. Ev Fedorenko lab, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
• January 2024: Invited speaker, Translational Neural Engineering Club, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
• November 2022: Shared my work mapping the brain’s speech and auditory regions at a Duke Institute for Brain Sciences-sponsored Duke Alumni event.

Research Updates

August 2026

Distinct neural processes link speech planning and execution

Although speaking recruits a distributed network of brain regions, it has been unclear how the brain coordinates planning a sentence with actually executing the movements to speak it. Using the high spatial and temporal resolution of intracranial recordings, this dissertation-based project identifies distinct neural mechanisms for speech planning versus speech execution.

Read more

During planning, different levels of speech units (e.g., phonemes, syllables) are represented discretely across distinct prefrontal sites. These planned units are then dynamically integrated across cortex to guide execution. During execution itself, speech motor regions generate continuous activity that reflects both the discrete planned units and the transitions between them — a rapid shift from discrete planning representations to continuous motor sequences that may help explain how speaking feels effortless.

Duraivel, S., Rahimpour, S., Barth, K., Chiang, C.H., Wang, C., Harward, S., Lad, N., Sexton, D., Friedman, A., Southwell, D., Sinha, S., Viventi, J., Cogan, G.B. (2026): Distinct neural processes link speech planning and execution, Nature Human Behaviour. Paper

July 2026

Shared latent representations of speech production for cross-patient speech decoding

Speech brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) could restore communication for people with neuromotor disorders, but current approaches require large amounts of patient-specific training data collected over long periods. This project asks whether aligning neural data from different patients into a shared latent space can allow a speech BCI to be trained across patients rather than starting from scratch for each one.

Read more

Combining data across patients is difficult because of differences in neuroanatomy, electrode placement, and sparse sampling of the targeted cortex. Using canonical correlation analysis with high-density micro-ECoG, we found shared latent neural dynamics across patients that preserved fine-grained, micro-scale speech information. Decoding models trained on this shared latent space outperformed patient-specific models, suggesting a path toward speech neuroprostheses that need less patient-specific training data.

Spalding, Z., Duraivel, S., Rahimpour, S., Wang, C., Barth, K., Schmitz, C., Lad, S.P., Friedman, A.H., Southwell, D.G., Viventi, J., Cogan, G.B. (2026): Shared latent representations of speech production for cross-patient speech decoding, Nature Communications. PaperCode

May 2026

Monosynaptic connections link functionally similar regions in human cortex

The functional organization of the human cortex has been mapped in detail, but the anatomical wiring linking these areas is much less understood. In this project, we used simultaneous electrical stimulation and fMRI (es-fMRI) in patients undergoing intracranial monitoring to trace direct, monosynaptic anatomical connections between cortical sites across the whole brain — including a link between the fusiform face area and the temporoparietal junction, two regions both implicated in social cognition.

Read more

Connectivity followed an asymmetric functional-similarity principle: sites that were directly connected tended to share similar functional profiles, but because anatomical connectivity is sparse, most pairs of functionally similar sites were not directly connected. Together, these results offer a first principled link between anatomical connectivity and functional organization in human cortex.

Xu, R., Bush, A., Takahashi, A., Sisterson, N., Walton, A., Hutchinson, S., Kammen, A., Neudorfer, C., Kokkinos, V., Nanda, P., Jhingan, N., Marvi, A., Fung, A., Duraivel, S., Richardson, R.M. (2026): Monosynaptic connections link functionally similar regions in human cortex, bioRxiv. Under review at Nature Paper

December 2023

High-resolution neural recordings improve the accuracy of speech decoding

People who lose the ability to speak due to neurodegenerative disease could regain communication through neural speech prostheses that decode intended speech directly from brain signals. This paper asks how much of that decoding bottleneck comes from the coarseness of standard intracranial recordings, using high-density micro-ECoG recorded during intraoperative speech production.

Read more

We recorded intraoperatively with high-density micro-electrocorticography (μECoG), achieving roughly 57 times higher spatial resolution and ~48% higher signal-to-noise ratio than standard macro-ECoG or SEEG electrodes. This higher-resolution signal improved speech decoding accuracy by about 35% relative to standard intracranial recordings, indicating that decoding performance for speech neuroprostheses is fundamentally limited by the spatial resolution of the recording interface, not just the decoding algorithm.

Duraivel, S., Rahimpour, S., Chiang, C.H., Trumpis, M., Wang, C., Barth, K., et al., Cogan, G.B. (2023): High-resolution neural recordings improve the accuracy of speech decoding, Nature Communications, 14(1), 6938. Paper


Contact